Do you need proof to believe In God? Do you believe, what made you?

----

No, I don't need proof to believe in lots of things, including God. Minds who insist on proof for everything lack the capacity to make judgments on subtle bases. Not all truth comes with proof. And most of the things we believe we believe without proof anyway, people just act as if they only believe things with proof when it comes to the important issues or the issues where they'd rather dismiss and deny something out of hand. And it's kind of arbitrary to take the side of not believing in something as default when there's no evidence either way--that could just as easily lead to error as believing in it, people are basically just terrified of the possibility of being seen as being *wrong* about anything.

Anyway, I believe in God for a couple of reasons. 1, I've experienced enough telepathic, empathic and other parapsychological experiences with other people to know we're all somehow connected and that minds aren't just brains, and also based on what I've read and how nature seems to operate in general I would guess that souls emanate from soul groups, soul groups emanate from soul group groups, etc. just like braches of a tree.. given these things it seems only natural that there would be a level of connection and unification between all beings on various levels, with God being the unification at the very the highest level, the level of everything/everybody.

2, I read the book Conversations with God by Neale Donald Walsch, in which Neale has a conversation in words with God (God says usually he communicates with us through imagination and that using words is actually a *last resort* since words are the most easily misinterpreted), and there were a couple of things about this text that made me think the entity he was communicating with was the real deal.

2.1, I'm very adept at finding faults of all kinds in others and in what they say or write, whether it's grammatical errors or subtle errors in word usage or just lack of grace in thought process or less than ideal motivations, etc., and I see tons of such shortcomings in every text I ever see. But I saw absolutely *none* in this text. None. Given how ubiquitously I see flaws in every other source of writing, speech or whatever, that was really surprising to me. And yes, obviously someone who's claiming to channel God is going to try to sound as perfect as possible, but this was perfect in ways that you can't appear to be just by wanting to.

2.2, the "energy" of the text was the purest and most neutral energy I've ever encountered (not neutral as in disinterested, but neutral as in free of biases and of all energies that are in any way specific, dirty or arbitrary), it was so pure it was almost unworldly. I guess it was like seeing my own soul.. (and no, I'm not claiming that my soul is somehow higher or purer than other souls, it's more like at the highest level everyone's soul is God..)